COURSE: INTRODUCTION IN SYSTEM DESIGN: STRUCTURAL APPROACH,
Sept. 2006 ... Jan. 2007 (Fall 2006)
INFORMATION: Jan. 16, 2007
VERY GOOD STUDENTS:
1. Igor A. Khodakovsky (group 316; 13/14), lab. works:
1(excellent prospective real world network applied example/project,
materials for presentation&article, 2(excellent applied example),
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10(excellent real world example), 11, 12(good real world example)
2. Vyacheslav V. Fedorov (group 315: 16/14), lab. works:
1(excellent real world example:
hierarchical plan for airplane company),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12(Cross Entropy Method)
3. Anton V. Safonov (group 311; 2/14), lab. works:
1(good & prospective applied example:
an applied project in conding/decoding field),
2(report is OK!),
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9(good example), 10, 11,
12(excellent work as multistage communication project,
materials for article/presentation)
4. Sergey V. Zhelnin (group 315; 1/14), lab. works:
1(excellent prospective applied example:
design of a microprocessor system,
to prepare article/presentation),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (Cross Entropy Method for TSP)
5. Stanislav Yu. Sharov (group 311; 3/14), lab. works:
1(very good & prospective real world example:
hierarchical planning of Web-technology,
to prepare article/presentation),
2, 3, 4, 5(good clique-based algorithm),
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12(a set of digital cameras)
6. Anton V. Korenyushkin (group 316, 6/10), lab works:
1(morphological approach to design of DM strategy,
excellent prospective work,
to prepare article/presentation),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(good example),
9, 10(very good example: a set of TV programs),
11, 12(genetic algorithms)
7. Ivan B. Sidorenko (group 312; 10/12), lab. works:
1(good applied example: design of building for football),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8(excellent example: disributed infrastrucutre
for hockey championship in Russia), 9, 10(good example),
11(very good real world applied problem),
12(vertex covering problem: useful & prospective)
8. Vasily A. Prohorov (group 312; 13/15), lab. works:
1(very good aplied exaample: hierarchical planning in turism),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10(good), 11,
12 (Algorithms/programs for The Quadratic Assignment Problem)
9. Anton S. Urusov (group 312; 6/12), lab. works:
1(excellent applied example:
hierarchical design of configuration for digital camera),
2, 3, 4,
5(only agglomerative algorithm, applied example is very good),
6, 7, 8(very good real world example; digital photo cameras),
9, 10(excellent prospective real world example:
digital photo cameras, good project),
11, 12(Graph Coloring Problem)
REPORTS ON LAB. WORKS:
10. Pavel G. Belevich (group 311; 1/8), lab. works: 1, 2, 3, 4,
5(to discuss), 6,
7, 8(good example: analysis of motherboards),
9, 10(good example), 11,
12(Cross Entropy Method for TSP)
11. Pavel V. Belayvsky (group 311; 0/8), lab. works:
1(good applied example,
enumerative algorithm and selection of Pareto-effective decisions)
2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12(genetic algorithm for allocation in sport)
12. Roman O. Vishnitsky (group 311; 0/8), lab. works:
1(real world problem: design of GSM network),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11,
12(configuration of facilities for cellular communication)
13. Dmitry K. Voytehovsky (grop 311; 1/13), lab. works:
1(applied example is good:
hierarchical design of a audio-light system),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
14. Denis A. Orlihin (group 311; 0/0), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (finish: Spring 2007,
additional work: materials for the laboratory works guide)
15. Michael S. Rasshepkin (group 311; 0/1),
lab. works:
1(synthesis method is not described),
2, 3, 4, 5(to discuss the algorithm), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(TSP, good project)
16. Michael A. Ryzhikov (group 311; 2/3), lab. works:
1(good applied example: hierarchical design of computer system),
2, 3, 4, 5(to discuss the algorithm), 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11, 12(genetic algorithm)
17. Anton A. Timakov (group 311; 1/6), lab. works:
1(good applied example, synthesis method is not understandable),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8(good example),
9(good exaple: assignment of specialists into projects),
10(good applied example), 11,
12(good real world problem: logistics)
18. Alexander V. Ushakov (group 311; 3/6), lab. works:
1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(Cross Entropy Method for TSP)
19. Evgeny V. Kharitonov (group 311; 0/3), lab. works:
1(excellent applied examle: computer project),
2, 3 (figure for multiple choice problem),
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(genetic algorithm for TSP - very good)
20. Daniil A. Shved (group 311; 1/7), lab. works:
1(synthesis:
enumerative method and selection of Pareto-effective solutions),
2, 3, 4,
5(good applied example: phone tariffs), 6, 7,
8(excelent prospective applied example: phone tariff plans),
9, 10, 11, 12(Cross Entropy Method for TSP)
21. Alexander S. Deryabin (group 312; 1/3), lab. works:
1(good applied example: design of cell phone),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(excellent applied example:
retail chains in Moscow & Moscow region),
9, 10, 11, 12(topological sorting)
22. Pavel A. Doronin (group 312; 6/9), lab. works:
1(only hierarchical model of a system, good example),
2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8(real world problem), 9, 10, 11,
12(quadratic assignment problem)
23. Nikolai E. Kosarev (group 312; 6/8), lab. works:
1(excellent applied example: hierarchical design of park area),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8(good example: a set of flights), 9,
10(good applied example:
university departments - professional domains),
11, 12(topological sorting)
24. Michael Yu. Kostin (group 312; 1/2), lab. works:
1(another method: enumerative algorithm &
selection of Pareto-effective solutions),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
25. Lev A. Rumyantsev (group 312; 1/12), lab. works:
1(good example, synthesis method is not understandable;
hierarchical planning a vacation),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8(good applied example), 9,
10(very good applied example: planning publishing house),
11,
12(dynamical programming for resource allocation between projects)
26. Andrey G. Smetanin (group 312; 0/8), lab. works:
1(not finalized),
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8(good example), 9, 10, 11,
12(ant system for quadratic assignment problem:
algorithm from internet)
27. Roman S. Tokarev (group 312; 1/8), lab. works:
1(good example: design of football stadium),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8(good applied example), 9, 10(good musical example),
11, 12(stable marriage problem)
28. Olga I. Belyakova (group 315; 12/12), lab. works: 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
29. Dmitry E. Kondratenko (group 315; 0/2), lab. works:
1(good example: design of cell phone),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(excellent applied example: a set of tanks),
9, 10(good example),
11,
12(topological sorting)
30. Vladimir V. Kobzev (group 315; 0/0), lab. works:
1 (synthesis method is not understandable),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12(Cross Entropy Method)
31. Artem I. Kruglov (group 315; 0/3), lab. works:
1(excellent prospective example:
design of management system for communication network,
material for article),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12(Cross Entropy for TSP)
32. Petr A. Ljvov (group 315; 1/1), lab. works:
1(good applied example - hierarchical plan for investment business,
synthesis method is not understandable),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8(real world example- a set of oil/gas regions,
material for article),
9, 10(good example), 11, 12(genetic algorithm)
33. Ivan S. Melnikov (group 315; 4/11),
lab. works:
1(excellent prospective real world example,
synthesis method is not understandable - to discuss),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10(good example: planning of goverment activities),
11,
12(Cross Entropy Method for Eight Queens Problem)
34. Nikolai A. Podvorchan (group 315; 3/3), lab. works:
1(very good applied example: trip planning, material for article),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(Cross Entropy Method for Eight Queens Problem)
35. Leonid V. Popov (group 315; 1/12), lab. works:
1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(Cross Entropy Method for Allocation Problem; good applied example)
36. Anton V. Slesarev (group 315; 0/3), lab. works:
1(applied example is very interesting: design of company web-site;
the problem formulations and solving method are not understanable -
about descriptions)
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9(good example: assignment of students into research projects),
10, 11,
12(genetic algorithm for 8 queen problem)
37. Sergey F. Utkin (group 315; 0/8), lab. works:
1(good applied example - hierarchcial model of enterprise,
synthesis method is not understandable),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11(good example),
12(Cross Entropy Method)
38. Andrey G. Chursov (group 315; 0/6), lab. works:
1(good example: design of an operation system)
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(Cross-Entropy Method for 8 Queens Problem)
39. Maxim A. Shpilkin (group 315; 0/10), lab. works:
1(excellent prospective real world example: design of mobile phone),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
40. Alexey A. Bakshaev (group 316; 4/2),
lab. works: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(good applied example),
9, 10 (good applied example), 11
41. Iriada I. Bardyshevskaya (group 316; 0/0), lab. works:
1(good example, synthesis method is not described),
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12 (genetic algorithm)
42. Alexander V. Gontarev (group 316; 1/2), lab. works:
2, 3(some figures correspond to the multiple choice problem),
4, 5, 6, 7,
8(excellent real world applied problem: a set of airplanes), 9,
10(excellent real world applied example:
a set of airplanes), 11
43. Yury P. Klochkov (group 316; 0/0), lab. works:
1(very good applied example- hierarchical photo system,
another synthesis method is used, the method is very simple),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11,
12(Quadratric Assigment Problem. excellent project)
44. Nadezhda A. Novozhenina (group 316; 5/1), lab. works:
1(excellent prospective example: planning in civil engineering),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10(good example), 11, 12
45. Dmitry V. Saraykin (group 316; 0/0), lab. works:
1(good applied example: design of cinema,
synthesis method is not understandable),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(??), 9, 10, 11, 12(dynamic programming for knapsack)
46. Yury N. Sudakov (group 316; 5/3), lab. works:
1(excellent applied example: design of motivation strategy for personnel;
another method is used for synthesis as multicriteria choice),
2, 3,
4 (plus extended version for new educational application),
5, 6, 7,
8(good applied example), 9, 10(good example: movies), 11,
12(genetic algorithm for TSP)
47. Kirill K. Tropin (group 316; 1/3), lab. works:
1(sport example, hierarchical morphological synthesis is not used),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12 (monitoring of sport for population)
48. Natalia G. Chilingaryan (group 316; 0/0), lab. works:
1(very good prospective example - planning a scientific journal,
material for article,
synthesis method is not described),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
49. Yulia A. Babenkova (group 316; 0/10), lab. works:
1(good applied example - design of corporative communication network,
morphological hierarchical design is not used),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(good example), 9,
10(good example: media plan for a company),
11,
12(very interesting two-stage applied example:
brand management as scheduling)
50. Roman V. Kozlov (group 317; 7/9), lab. works:
1(design of Web-forum; very good example: to prepare a paper)
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10(8),
11, 12(dynamic programming for knapsack problem)
51. Dmitry A. Smal (group 317; 1/9), lab. works:
1(excellent example: enterprise information system)
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(good examples: a set of mobile phones), 9,
10(good example: assignemnt of personnel), 11,
12(Graph Coloring Problem; very good work)
52. Anton V. Stepanenko (group 317; 0/1), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(topological sorting)
53. Evgeny N. Titov (group 317; 0/2), lab. works:
1(good sport example, synthesis method is not understandable),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8(good communication example -
plan of extension/development of communication/phone network for Moscow,
material for article),
9, 10(only numerical example), 11, 12(dynamic programaming)
54. Vasiliy N. Solodovnikov (group 317; 0/5), lab. works:
1(excellent applied example - robot, material for an article)
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10(good example), 11,
12(dynamic programming algorithm for knapsack problem)
55. Alexander V. Khromenkov (group 317; 0/1), lab. works:
1(only hierarchical model, good example:
hierarchical planning of private life),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12(dynamic programming)
56. Alexey M. Loskutov (group 317; 0/4), lab. works:
1(good example), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12(cross entropy method for TSP)
